Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 15:15
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What firsthand information do you have on prisoner-on-prisoner sexual abuse/rape?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How can someone get patrons on Patreon if they are a beginner artist?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Boisson Beats Andreeva, Updated French Open Women's Bracket at Roland-Garros - Bleacher Report
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Do you think Harris will win thanks to Taylor Swift and the Swifties?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Americans Could See Electric Bills Jump 4% in the Summer Heat - PYMNTS.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s the craziest thing you’ve heard pretending to be asleep?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.